Kia ora Daniel

Thanks for your further email and I have noted your points.

It’s clear from your response that you hold a very different view on these matters than I and the Ministry of Health do.

I am very confident in the process we have run to advise the Government on the rollout of the paediatric vaccine in NZ, and parents have access to good information to support them to make the choice to vaccinate their children.

I do not think that any further correspondence on these matters will be productive so the Ministry will not be responding further to similar emails.

Ngā mihi nui

Ashley

Dr Ashley Bloomfield

Te Tumu Whakarae mō te Hauora

Director-General of Health

Pronouns: He/Him

email: ashley.bloomfield@health.govt.nz

Mobile: +64-21-926 302

www.health.govt.nz

Dear Ashley Bloomfield,

As the contact person representing The New Zealand Ministry of Health at 133 Molesworth St Thorndon.

We are deeply grateful for your reply but equally concerned. In the first paragraph you stated.

"Thank you for your email. While it is generally shown that COVID-19 has mild effects in children and is rarely severe or fatal, the COVID-19 virus can be unpredictable. While COVID-19 generally has milder effects in children, with symptoms being similar to a cold, some children become severely ill and require hospitalisation. Children can also have rare complications such as Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome (MIS-C) that may require intensive care. Children can also suffer long term effects (known as long COVID), even after mild cases of COVID-19."

That COVID-19 has mild effects in children and is rarely severe or fatal. In stating that it appears to be little more severe than the common cold, something children were not vaccinated for in the past and as they matured developed ever increasing natural immunity. So why now?

That COVID 19 can be unpredictable. Is this not the case in most colds and viruses? Are not the vaccine responses even more unpredictable than the disease itself and some cases lethal? Why has our government not given advice on treating COVID at home? Why are prophylactics discouraged? Why were doctors threatened loss of their practicing license should they dare do what doctors normally do…treat patients?

That some children become severely ill and require hospitalization. Reports of hospitalizations can be viewed here [1] . What data do we have on hospitalizations from previous years on complications from the common cold or flu? This happens with all seasonal flu’s so why is this different?

You stated Children can also have rare complications such as Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome (MIS-C) that may require intensive care. Does the MoH site have data on this at all? We have not been able to find any information on the official site. By your admission this condition is rare and does it justify immunizing the whole population of 5 to 11 year olds to protect a few? Can you elaborate on what the risk is and what percentages of children are at risk of MIS-C?

You stated that Children can also suffer long term effects (known as long COVID), even after mild cases of COVID-19." When you refer to long term effects (know as long COVID). Can you specify in terms of time what this refers to? As yet we can hardly refer to any more than around 20 months. What are the symptoms? How do they compare with myocarditis or pericarditis a well documented side effect from the vaccine, in severity leading to permanent tissue damage

In your second paragraph you made the assertions.

"Additionally, like adults, if children are infected with the COVID-19 virus, they may transmit the virus to other people. Immunising 5- to 11-year-old children helps protect family members whose health makes them more vulnerable to COVID-19. It is for these reasons, we are extending the COVID-19 vaccination programme to children in this age group."

You stated , if children are infected with the COVID-19 virus, they may transmit the virus to other people. This contradicts the measures taken at the start of the pandemic where children could go to school mask-less and mingle with other children with little to no risk that they would transmit COVID-19. This implied at that time that the pathogen only selected hosts above the age of 12 and 13. Now this appears to have changed. Please explain why they are now hosts for the pathogen. And does the vaccine stop the spread?

You stated that immunizing 5- to 11-year-old children helps protect family members whose health makes them more vulnerable to COVID-1. Does the vaccine stop the spread?
Maybe have a read of read the recent article by NZDSOS [2] and that of Steve Kirsch [3] [4] which casts some doubt on your claims. Please comment on their statements, as we the nation do not want our children to be part of an unregulated and illegal experiment.

On the matter of informed consent which has been has been hidden from the general public and that public disclosure on the facts pertaining to this vaccine are woefully lacking. Facts stated in the links below by these and many more states: "That makes the COVID vaccines the new leader by a long shot: the most dangerous vaccine ever created in history. They are 800X more dangerous than the smallpox vaccine with respect to death, and over 25X worse with respect to permanent disability"" [5], Please explain why we have no other vaccine to choose from.

Not disclosing these facts and discouraging them being revealed, every step of the way, by means of ‘informed consent’ you, and those in authority, run the risk of violating the Nuremberg Code. We are able to provide you with both the Nuremberg documents and that of UNESCO where it is clearly laid out. Please refer to guidelines made up by Sue Grey and NZDSOS [6] which resulted in hundreds of Principals being emailed by concerned parents. Provided is a map showing locations of schools [7].

We ask what steps has the Ministry of Health taken to offer a true and unbiased informed consent form before injecting children with the Pfizer agent?

Refer to question 8 of the informed consent project https://www.nuremberg.nz/projects/competitions/index.php [8], which talks about the Japanese Biodiversity Study that Dr Robert Malone and Dr Bert Weinstein discuss the risks. From our previous email in point 6, we asked the question:

"Given that the number of children in NZ who are 5-11 is 450,000 and the expected birthrate per couple is approximately 1.6 [9], we can expect these children to have 360,000 children. A 10% infertility rate would lead to 36,000 not being born at 50% this number jumps to a staggering 180,000. In the absence of evidence to disprove this as a possibility, why would any sovereign country ever take that risk?".

If any child 5-11 dies, suffers injury, or is made infertile as a result of the "Vaccination Program", are you willing as Director-General of Health to take personal responsibility?

I can say without a shadow of a doubt I would not.

In Paragraph 3 you mentioned COVID-19 Vaccine Technical Advisory Group (CV TAG) and their recommendations.

"The vaccine trials in 5 to 11-year-olds with a paediatric (child) dose of the Pfizer showed the vaccine was safe, and side effects were similar to those observed with the full dose in 12 to 15-year-olds. The side effects were generally mild. Millions of people aged 12 to 15 have now been vaccinated around the world, and no additional safety concerns have been raised. The Ministry of Health also receives regular advice from science experts in the COVID-19 Vaccine Technical Advisory Group (CV TAG) which recommends the use of COVID-19 vaccines in different age groups. CV TAG have considered all scientific and technical data in recommending the use of vaccination in these age groups and will continue to monitor safety data from the real-world rollout internationally and in Aotearoa New Zealand."

In response to "CV TAG have considered all scientific and technical data", this statement sounds very familiar to the one used by Xavier Becerra of the Human Health services. [9] However when asked Dr Rand Paul if he was familiar with the Israeli study with 2.5 Million participants which found those with natural immunity were 7 times less likely to be infected with Covid19 that the vaccinated group, he replied he was not familiar with that study and he would get back to him. I ask you and the CV TAG group, are you aware of this study?

Are you or the CV TAG group aware of the early intervention packs that worked in Uttar Pradesh [10] Uttar Pradesh has 230,000,000 people , is densely populated and now COVID free. Health officials went from door to door to give each household a home survival treatment kit with the following: Paracetamol tablets [tylenol], vitamin C, A Multivitamin, Zinc, Vitamin D3, Ivermectin 12 mg [quantity #10 tablets], Doxycycline 100 mg [quantity #10 tablets].( anti biotic for secondary bacterial infection

Other non-medication components included: Face masks, sanitizer, gloves, alcohol wipes, a digital thermometer, and a pulse oximeter.

Given this resounding success and at a cost of $5 per pack, do you still consider the NZ response of sending out a Muesli bar as sufficient? Why was Ivermectin banned fin New Zealand? Why were doctors threatened if they prescribed it?

I suggest you look at Uttar Pradesh[11] and the nature of governance there and how very different their approach is to ours. This was first aired on All India News so it is part of Global mainstream media. Why did we not get to hear of it?

Are you or the CV TAG group aware of the effect on fertility [12] from https://openvaers.com/covid-data/reproductive-health.

In Paragraph 4 You mention the number 45,984 adverse reactions, out of 8.1 Million Jabs.

"Noting your interest in the safety of the Pfizer vaccine, we refer you to regular reports published by Medsafe which is the health authority that monitors the number and type of adverse events following COVID-19 immunisation that are reported. You can find these reports here: https://www.medsafe.govt.nz/COVID-19/vaccine-report-overview.asp. Up to 31 December 2021, a total of 8,184,892 doses of the Pfizer vaccine have been administered and 45,984 adverse events following immunisation were reported. This means that more than 8.1 million doses of Pfizer were administered that did not result in a report of an adverse event."

While you make this sound like a small number by comparison to the 8.1 Million jabs, do you recognize that each one of these cases is a person who has in fact suffered damages and in some cases their lives destroyed [13] from your vaccine rollout program Are you aware of the peoples database which has recorded over 300 deaths? Are you aware that these numbers in likelihood are out by an order of magnitude [4] ie 450,000 adverse reactions?

At this point I think it is necessary to refer you back to article [3] By Steve Kirsch that unequivocally states "As of November 1, 2021, there have been more adverse events reported for the COVID vaccines than for all 70+ vaccines combined since they started tracking adverse events 30 years ago."  I agree with him "That’s a stunning statistic, nobody can deny it,".  Ashley Bloomfield Do you deny it? It would seem from paragraph 4 that you are in Denial. Is the statement that the Pfizer Injection is "Safe and Effective" True or False?

In paragraph 5 you make the the statement that 93% of New Zealanders are fully vaccinated and that this is evidence of New Zealanders support for the program, and that my views are that of a small minority.

"To date, 93 percent of the eligible population of New Zealand has been fully vaccinated. It is evident that the vast majority of New Zealanders support and approve of the country’s COVID-19 vaccination programme, putting your views in the very small minority opposed to the programme."

I feel it necessary to correct you here. First of all, the vaccines clearly don't work [14], anyone of the 93% who have taken it, were either lied to through government in collaboration with main stream media or coerced into it though being told they would lose their job, or not being able to participate in society.

Are you aware that 94% of 25,000 New Zealand respondents said "NO" when asked the question [15], "Should vaccine certificates be mandatory at hospitality businesses?"?

Are you aware that an analysis of reactions to the PM's Facebook post's [16] show that less than 10% of the popular comments are in support of the Vaccination program?

Are you aware that by contrast Facebook Posts for her adversary Sue Grey [17] are 90%+ in support?

Are you aware that 95% of those who have voted for our prime minister on the Nuremberg website have voted her "UP" on the accused list? [18]

Are you aware that of the 191 comments that were made on her Nuremberg profile and 2148 votes Jelena Algie's comment [19] has been agreed with 102 times and not agreed with only once (99%)?

Given these facts there is ample evidence to suggest this is in fact one of the most unpopular "rollouts" of any kind in history. When we consider Boris Johnson's [20] recent address to the house of the UK parliament recently where he announced they are dropping all mandates and "Trusting the English people" (2 mins 13s) receiving a round of applause, the only popular decision is to give people the respect they deserve.

This is a very timely decision as the London Hammer-smith [21] investigation gets underway and vaccination clinics around the UK are being shut down. Reiner Fuelmich's [22] announcement that they have conclusive evidence through the batch numbers [23], and that the deaths from vaccines are in fact deliberate[22]. International Criminal Court action from Mike Yeadon and others [24] is also well underway, the full 46 page document of accusations is here [25]. I wish this were all just conspiracy theory or even perhaps "my point of view", but this is just a small fraction of what is happening.

There really is no escaping the ultimate reality of what this experimental jab is. To claim with any certainty otherwise is to in all likelihood to be complicit with murder.

Please reconsider your position with regard to vaccinating 5-11 year children, what would be the harm in delaying it for a few months until the dust settles on all of this information?

Kind Regards Daniel Suter
dan@nuremberg.nz
www.nuremberg.nz

References

[1] https://www.health.govt.nz/our-work/diseases-and-conditions/covid-19-novel-coronavirus/covid-19-data-and-statistics/covid-19-current-cases
[2] https://nzdsos.com/2022/01/16/can-kids-get-seriously-ill-with-covid/
[3] https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/new-vaers-analysis-reveals-hundreds
[4] https://www.skirsch.com/covid/Deaths.pdf
[5] https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/according-to-dr-paul-offit-we-should
[6] https://suegrey.nz/articles/140043/Email-your-school-to-say-no-jab
[7] https://www.suegrey.nz/projects/competitions/in2win.php
[8] https://www.nuremberg.nz/projects/competitions/index.php
[9] https://youtu.be/vPsjH-FJFww?t=280
[10] https://www.who.int/india
[11] https://www.zerohedge.com/covid-19/indias-ivermectin-blackout-secret-revealed
[12] https://openvaers.com/covid-data/reproductive-health
[13] https://www.nuremberg.nz/vote.php?a=140857
[14] https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10654-021-00808-7.pdf
[15] https://www.newshub.co.nz/home/new-zealand/2021/10/have-your-say-should-vaccine-certificates-be-mandatory-at-hospitality-businesses.html
[16] https://www.nuremberg.nz/articles/140055/Complete-lack-of-support-for-Government.-
[17] https://www.nuremberg.nz/articles/140824/Sue-Grey-gets-an-incredible-91-percent-support-of-kiwis
[18] https://www.nuremberg.nz/the-accused/
[19] https://www.nuremberg.nz/vote.php?a=140713
[20] https://youtu.be/9KQKhcLRO3o
[21] https://www.saveusnow.org.uk/directors-of-public-health-criminal-investigation-notification-vaccine-danger-warning/
[22] https://www.bitchute.com/video/TLvoJLEomKBH/
[23] https://www.howbadismybatch.com/pfizertoxicity.pdf
[24] https://www.nuremberg.nz/articles/140863/Nuremberg-UK-is-underway.--Complaint-with-International-Criminal-Court-Filed
[25] https://www.docdroid.com/WUjv6iw/icc-complaint-7-1-pdf

OFFICE_CODES:

Dated : January 23, 2022, 10:11 pm
ET188 : NURADD59